http://www.brew52.com/2008/week5/summitblah/ 52 Minnesota beers reviewed for the 52 weeks of 2008. Sat, 11 Feb 2012 07:00:41 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4 http://www.brew52.com/2008/week5/summitblah/comment-page-1/#comment-440 Shaitan Fri, 15 Feb 2008 20:27:02 +0000 http://www.brew52.com/2008/week5/summitblah/#comment-440 What ryan and al said. What ryan and al said.

]]> http://www.brew52.com/2008/week5/summitblah/comment-page-1/#comment-310 al Thu, 07 Feb 2008 06:16:21 +0000 http://www.brew52.com/2008/week5/summitblah/#comment-310 If you didn't try it, you can't have an opinion on it, and therefore aren't allowed to review it! Seems so simple. If you didn’t try it, you can’t have an opinion on it, and therefore aren’t allowed to review it! Seems so simple.

]]> http://www.brew52.com/2008/week5/summitblah/comment-page-1/#comment-309 ryan Thu, 07 Feb 2008 05:36:35 +0000 http://www.brew52.com/2008/week5/summitblah/#comment-309 How can you review it if you didn't try it? How can you review it if you didn’t try it?

]]> http://www.brew52.com/2008/week5/summitblah/comment-page-1/#comment-308 Eric Thu, 07 Feb 2008 05:19:50 +0000 http://www.brew52.com/2008/week5/summitblah/#comment-308 Dood! I'm baffled by your review! Not one Summit style? Not even the Grand on a hot summer day? Tell me more...I think all their beers are so different, some better, some worse, but different. Dood! I’m baffled by your review! Not one Summit style? Not even the Grand on a hot summer day? Tell me more…I think all their beers are so different, some better, some worse, but different.

]]>