http://www.brew52.com/2008/week4/so-much-better-on-tap-still-quite-good-in-the-can/ 52 Minnesota beers reviewed for the 52 weeks of 2008. Sat, 11 Feb 2012 07:00:41 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4 http://www.brew52.com/2008/week4/so-much-better-on-tap-still-quite-good-in-the-can/comment-page-1/#comment-127 DeRushaJ Fri, 25 Jan 2008 03:54:48 +0000 http://www.brew52.com/2008/week4/so-much-better-on-tap-still-quite-good-in-the-can/#comment-127 I see I need to make a mistake in order to generate comments. Cool. I'll use that strategy every week. I see I need to make a mistake in order to generate comments. Cool. I’ll use that strategy every week.

]]> http://www.brew52.com/2008/week4/so-much-better-on-tap-still-quite-good-in-the-can/comment-page-1/#comment-125 al Fri, 25 Jan 2008 00:25:35 +0000 http://www.brew52.com/2008/week4/so-much-better-on-tap-still-quite-good-in-the-can/#comment-125 I was pretty confused, there, too. Had me thinking of "Green Eggs & Ham"...would you, would you in a Gremlin...would you, would you with a ...Femlin?" (that's what Leroy Neiman called the little spot drawings of cartoon playmates that appeared in Playboy...it's the only thing I can think of that rhymes with Gremlin!) I was pretty confused, there, too. Had me thinking of “Green Eggs & Ham”…would you, would you in a Gremlin…would you, would you with a …Femlin?”
(that’s what Leroy Neiman called the little spot drawings of cartoon playmates that appeared in Playboy…it’s the only thing I can think of that rhymes with Gremlin!)

]]> http://www.brew52.com/2008/week4/so-much-better-on-tap-still-quite-good-in-the-can/comment-page-1/#comment-121 Scott Thu, 24 Jan 2008 16:28:10 +0000 http://www.brew52.com/2008/week4/so-much-better-on-tap-still-quite-good-in-the-can/#comment-121 I was wondering if you were advocating for drinking and driving. At least it wasn't in a Pinto. I was wondering if you were advocating for drinking and driving. At least it wasn’t in a Pinto.

]]> http://www.brew52.com/2008/week4/so-much-better-on-tap-still-quite-good-in-the-can/comment-page-1/#comment-120 Eric Thu, 24 Jan 2008 15:38:22 +0000 http://www.brew52.com/2008/week4/so-much-better-on-tap-still-quite-good-in-the-can/#comment-120 Admittedly, I did spend about 10 minutes on google, trying to see if maybe a gremlin was some sort keg system I had never heard of. It's of course not, but it is suggested that the word "gremlin" is derived from goblins who supposedly lived in beer bottles of the brand Kremlin. Admittedly, I did spend about 10 minutes on google, trying to see if maybe a gremlin was some sort keg system I had never heard of. It’s of course not, but it is suggested that the word “gremlin” is derived from goblins who supposedly lived in beer bottles of the brand Kremlin.

]]> http://www.brew52.com/2008/week4/so-much-better-on-tap-still-quite-good-in-the-can/comment-page-1/#comment-119 Chad Thu, 24 Jan 2008 14:37:12 +0000 http://www.brew52.com/2008/week4/so-much-better-on-tap-still-quite-good-in-the-can/#comment-119 I like Gremlin better. I like Gremlin better.

]]> http://www.brew52.com/2008/week4/so-much-better-on-tap-still-quite-good-in-the-can/comment-page-1/#comment-118 Eric Thu, 24 Jan 2008 14:32:07 +0000 http://www.brew52.com/2008/week4/so-much-better-on-tap-still-quite-good-in-the-can/#comment-118 Gremlin? You mean growler? Gremlin? You mean growler?

]]>