<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.2" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Golden it is, barleywine not so much.</title>
	<link>http://www.brew52.com/2008/week13/golden-it-is-barleywine-not-so-much/</link>
	<description>Reviewing a different Minnesota beer each week for the entire year.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 14:05:58 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: brendan</title>
		<link>http://www.brew52.com/2008/week13/golden-it-is-barleywine-not-so-much/#comment-875</link>
		<dc:creator>brendan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 17:59:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.brew52.com/2008/week13/golden-it-is-barleywine-not-so-much/#comment-875</guid>
		<description>English golden barleywines are a horse of a different color when compared to american barleywines like bigfoot or hogheaven.  From my experience the american versions are more bitter and alcoholic, while the english ones tend to be more rounded.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>English golden barleywines are a horse of a different color when compared to american barleywines like bigfoot or hogheaven.  From my experience the american versions are more bitter and alcoholic, while the english ones tend to be more rounded.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
