<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Brew52 &#187; Snow Storm</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.brew52.com/2008/tag/snow-storm/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.brew52.com/2008</link>
	<description>52 Minnesota beers reviewed for the 52 weeks of 2008.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2009 15:16:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
		<item>
		<title>snow strom thurmond</title>
		<link>http://www.brew52.com/2008/week1/snow-strom-thurmond/</link>
		<comments>http://www.brew52.com/2008/week1/snow-strom-thurmond/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 21:16:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>flashmcduff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Week 1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[schells]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Snow Storm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[winter ale]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brew52.com/2008/week1/snow-strom-thurmond/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;m not a changed man after drinking this.  That said, I was pleased to have Snow Storm around when the alternative was a case of Miller Lite my relatives were lusting over.  Drinkable, and pleasingly so, but definitely not the boldest of winter brews.  Sweet, but not too much, with a clean finish.  A pretty noncomittal, Minnesota Nice [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not a changed man after drinking this.  That said, I was pleased to have Snow Storm around when the alternative was a case of Miller Lite my relatives were lusting over.  Drinkable, and pleasingly so, but definitely not the boldest of winter brews.  Sweet, but not too much, with a clean finish.  A pretty noncomittal, Minnesota Nice ale. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.brew52.com/2008/week1/snow-strom-thurmond/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Thank you sir, may I NOT have another?</title>
		<link>http://www.brew52.com/2008/week1/thank-you-sir-may-i-not-have-another/</link>
		<comments>http://www.brew52.com/2008/week1/thank-you-sir-may-i-not-have-another/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2008 04:25:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>MikeyB</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Week 1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bad Beer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shells]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Snow Storm]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brew52.com/2008/week1/thank-you-sir-may-i-not-have-another/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sure I would drink it again&#8230;if it was free and the last beer in the fridge and it was a Sunday and could not purchase any other beer from the liqueur store. Basically it wasn&#8217;t very good. Thankfully next years Snow Storm will taste differently.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sure I would drink it again&#8230;if it was free and the last beer in the fridge and it was a Sunday and could not purchase any other beer from the liqueur store. Basically it wasn&#8217;t very good. Thankfully next years Snow Storm will taste differently.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.brew52.com/2008/week1/thank-you-sir-may-i-not-have-another/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.388 seconds -->

