<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Brew52 &#187; schell</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.brew52.com/2008/tag/schell/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.brew52.com/2008</link>
	<description>52 Minnesota beers reviewed for the 52 weeks of 2008.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2009 15:16:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
		<item>
		<title>A big commitment</title>
		<link>http://www.brew52.com/2008/week52/a-big-commitment/</link>
		<comments>http://www.brew52.com/2008/week52/a-big-commitment/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2009 14:52:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rett</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Week 52]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[august schell brewing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rye]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[schell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Schell Snowstorm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[snowstorm]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brew52.com/2008/week52/a-big-commitment/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ll be honest, I preferred last year&#8217;s Snowstorm. I think it had to do with the surprise of what looked to be a darker winter ale actually being a fruity Belgian. But then it&#8217;s unfair to compare these two completely different styles. So for the rye that it is, I enjoy it quite a bit. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll be honest, I preferred last year&#8217;s Snowstorm. I think it had to do with the surprise of what looked to be a darker winter ale actually being a fruity Belgian. But then it&#8217;s unfair to compare these two completely different styles. So for the rye that it is, I enjoy it quite a bit. Enough that I just picked up another 12 pack, and for me, the guy with a 9 months pregnant wife who&#8217;s cut way back on beer intake, that&#8217;s a big commitment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.brew52.com/2008/week52/a-big-commitment/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Flurries</title>
		<link>http://www.brew52.com/2008/week52/flurries/</link>
		<comments>http://www.brew52.com/2008/week52/flurries/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2008 00:19:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joe Lunchpail</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Week 52]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[schell]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brew52.com/2008/week52/flurries/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While much better than the 2007 Snowstorm, I&#8217;m not really that impressed with the 2008 version.  Definitely malty, with the rye coming through as well.  They say hints of chocolate, but I&#8217;m not catching it.  Good head and carbonation.  Not bad, not great.  Pretty much par for Schell.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While much better than the 2007 Snowstorm, I&#8217;m not really that impressed with the 2008 version.  Definitely malty, with the rye coming through as well.  They say hints of chocolate, but I&#8217;m not catching it.  Good head and carbonation.  Not bad, not great.  Pretty much par for Schell.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.brew52.com/2008/week52/flurries/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Best of Schell&#8217;s Line-up</title>
		<link>http://www.brew52.com/2008/week37/the-best-of-schells-line-up/</link>
		<comments>http://www.brew52.com/2008/week37/the-best-of-schells-line-up/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 20:51:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joe Lunchpail</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Week 37]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[schell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stout]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brew52.com/2008/week37/the-best-of-schells-line-up/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Not that it takes much, but the Stout is far and away the most flavorful and impressive of all Schell beers.  Looking more like a bottle of root beer that you might buy at Gander Mountain or Cabela&#8217;s than an actual bottle of the suds, it&#8217;s a bit deceiving to the eye.  Good, bold choco-coffee [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not that it takes much, but the Stout is far and away the most flavorful and impressive of all Schell beers.  Looking more like a bottle of root beer that you might buy at Gander Mountain or Cabela&#8217;s than an actual bottle of the suds, it&#8217;s a bit deceiving to the eye.  Good, bold choco-coffee stout flavor and heavy enough to fill the belly with warmth, I really enjoy this beer. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.brew52.com/2008/week37/the-best-of-schells-line-up/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Third is the word</title>
		<link>http://www.brew52.com/2008/week42/third-is-the-word/</link>
		<comments>http://www.brew52.com/2008/week42/third-is-the-word/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 20:42:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joe Lunchpail</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Week 42]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oktoberfest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[schell]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brew52.com/2008/week42/third-is-the-word/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have to agree with Rett here.  Putting the Schell up against the Summit and Surly varieties is a guaranteed bronze for the New Ulm nectar.  Not that its a bad beer, which it is not.  It is just that it lacks the personality and &#8220;flava&#8221; of it&#8217;s Oktoberfest counterparts.  On par with most Schell [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to agree with Rett here.  Putting the Schell up against the Summit and Surly varieties is a guaranteed bronze for the New Ulm nectar.  Not that its a bad beer, which it is not.  It is just that it lacks the personality and &#8220;flava&#8221; of it&#8217;s Oktoberfest counterparts.  On par with most Schell offerings, which always just seem to lack a little punch.  Schell:the C-student Minnesota beer.  Don&#8217;t get down, though, you can still be President.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.brew52.com/2008/week42/third-is-the-word/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Bronze Medal</title>
		<link>http://www.brew52.com/2008/week42/the-bronze-medal/</link>
		<comments>http://www.brew52.com/2008/week42/the-bronze-medal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 00:47:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rett</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Week 42]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[august schell brewing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[octoberfest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[schell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[schell octoberfest]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brew52.com/2008/week42/the-bronze-medal/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Alright, time for catch up. Schell Octoberfest definitely had a tough act to follow, coming after both Summit and Surly. If I had to rate the three, I&#8217;d probably put Schell&#8217;s in third, but that&#8217;s not to say I didn&#8217;t enjoy it. Definitely had the characteristic Marzen style taste, heavy on the malt, but pretty [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alright, time for catch up. Schell Octoberfest definitely had a tough act to follow, coming after both Summit and Surly. If I had to rate the three, I&#8217;d probably put Schell&#8217;s in third, but that&#8217;s not to say I didn&#8217;t enjoy it. Definitely had the characteristic Marzen style taste, heavy on the malt, but pretty smooth. I think it was just a little less flavorful by comparison.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.brew52.com/2008/week42/the-bronze-medal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>I give it one big spiraly circle!</title>
		<link>http://www.brew52.com/2008/week41/i-give-it-one-big-spiraly-circle/</link>
		<comments>http://www.brew52.com/2008/week41/i-give-it-one-big-spiraly-circle/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 13:50:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rett</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Week 41]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ABR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[august schell brewing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[macs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[schell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[schell bavarian forest dampfbier]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brew52.com/2008/week41/i-give-it-one-big-spiraly-circle/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Much of my experience at the Autumn Brew Review is a blur, but fortunately I was smart enough to keep detailed notes in my program guide as to what beers I tasted and which ones I liked. And by detailed notes I mean a series of different pencil scribbles that I seemed to abandon about [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Much of my experience at the Autumn Brew Review is a blur, but fortunately I was smart enough to keep detailed notes in my program guide as to what beers I tasted and which ones I liked. And by detailed notes I mean a series of different pencil scribbles that I seemed to abandon about half way through. I hit up the Minnesota booths first so most of them are marked, and next to Schell&#8217;s Bavarian Forest Dampfbier is a big spiraly circle while many just have a check, or a dash, or in some cases a sad face. <span id="more-640"></span>(Note to self: if Brew52 happens again in the future, replace star rating system with a series of pencil scribbles)</p>
<p>Anyway, I went to Mac&#8217;s Industrial Sports Bar on Thursday and had a pint of the Bavarian Forest just to make sure that the big circle in my program guide wasn&#8217;t a mistake (or the beginning of a sad yuck face). Good news, it was definitely a &#8220;this beer rocks!&#8221; circle. It&#8217;s got a really great crisp taste with some light fruity aroma (they say banana) which I love. I will hopefully be snagging another pint before they run out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.brew52.com/2008/week41/i-give-it-one-big-spiraly-circle/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>the jig is up</title>
		<link>http://www.brew52.com/2008/week37/the-jig-is-up/</link>
		<comments>http://www.brew52.com/2008/week37/the-jig-is-up/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2008 03:40:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rett</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Week 37]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[august schell brewing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chocolate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[girly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[schell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[schell's stout]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sweet]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brew52.com/2008/week37/the-jig-is-up/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I tried Schell&#8217;s Stout while over at Josh&#8217;s on Saturday night. It was important to me that I drink a thicker man beer as we were being coaxed into watching Baby Mama with our ladies. Actually I had wanted to see that a bit myself, mainly because Tina Fey is awesome, and hot. Anyway, the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I tried Schell&#8217;s Stout while over at Josh&#8217;s on Saturday night. It was important to me that I drink a thicker man beer as we were being coaxed into watching Baby Mama with our ladies. Actually I had wanted to see that a bit myself, mainly because Tina Fey is awesome, and hot. Anyway, the beer was really good, very sweet and chocolatey, which now as I&#8217;m typing I&#8217;m realizing means that it is probably not very manly at all. But at least it&#8217;s dark. Ok, I guess the jig is up, I like girl movies and sweet chocolate beers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.brew52.com/2008/week37/the-jig-is-up/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pils popper</title>
		<link>http://www.brew52.com/2008/week11/pils-popper/</link>
		<comments>http://www.brew52.com/2008/week11/pils-popper/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 15:02:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joe Lunchpail</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Week 11]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[schell]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brew52.com/2008/week11/pils-popper/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Per usual, the Schell folks put out a good, not great, beer that is light in flavor and easy to drink.  I can&#8217;t think of much to say about this offering, except that I prefer it to the typical domestic light beers.  A little more body, a lot better flavor, and overall a more satisfying [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Per usual, the Schell folks put out a good, not great, beer that is light in flavor and easy to drink.  I can&#8217;t think of much to say about this offering, except that I prefer it to the typical domestic light beers.  A little more body, a lot better flavor, and overall a more satisfying bottle of suds.  A good balance of malt and hops.  I will drink it again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.brew52.com/2008/week11/pils-popper/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Standard Lager</title>
		<link>http://www.brew52.com/2008/week22/standard-lager/</link>
		<comments>http://www.brew52.com/2008/week22/standard-lager/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 May 2008 00:39:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Week 22]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lager]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lakemaid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[schell]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brew52.com/2008/week22/standard-lager/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The label on this beer is the best part. The tricky Photoshop work is almost worth the price of the 12-pack. I wouldn&#8217;t call it tasty but it isn&#8217;t bad either. I would buy something cheaper if I wanted this type of beer.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The label on this beer is the best part. The tricky Photoshop work is almost worth the price of the 12-pack. I wouldn&#8217;t call it tasty but it isn&#8217;t bad either. I would buy something cheaper if I wanted this type of beer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.brew52.com/2008/week22/standard-lager/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mmmm, fish-chicks.</title>
		<link>http://www.brew52.com/2008/week22/mmmm-fish-chicks/</link>
		<comments>http://www.brew52.com/2008/week22/mmmm-fish-chicks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 13:21:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rett</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Week 22]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fish-chicks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lager]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lakemaid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mer-babes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mermaids]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rapala]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[schell]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brew52.com/2008/week22/mmmm-fish-chicks/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;m no fisherman, but I have to agree that there is nothing better than the idea of a mer-babe surfacing on a lake to bring me a beer. Apparently the advertising firm Pocket Hercules was able to convince both Schell and Rapala of this as well. The best part is that in this fisherman&#8217;s fantasy [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m no fisherman, but I have to agree that there is nothing better than the idea of a mer-babe surfacing on a lake to bring me a beer. Apparently the advertising firm <a href="http://pockethercules.com" target="_blank">Pocket Hercules</a> was able to convince both Schell and Rapala of this as well. The best part is that in this fisherman&#8217;s fantasy there&#8217;s not one, but twelve bikini-clad fish-chicks, one for each bottle in a 12-pack. Being a classic American lager it&#8217;s easy to go through several of these in one sitting, perfect for boating on a lake, or in my case, sitting in front of the television.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.brew52.com/2008/week22/mmmm-fish-chicks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.294 seconds -->

