<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Brew52 &#187; Week 52</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.brew52.com/2008/category/week52/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.brew52.com/2008</link>
	<description>52 Minnesota beers reviewed for the 52 weeks of 2008.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2009 15:16:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
		<item>
		<title>A big commitment</title>
		<link>http://www.brew52.com/2008/week52/a-big-commitment/</link>
		<comments>http://www.brew52.com/2008/week52/a-big-commitment/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2009 14:52:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rett</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Week 52]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[august schell brewing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rye]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[schell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Schell Snowstorm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[snowstorm]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brew52.com/2008/week52/a-big-commitment/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ll be honest, I preferred last year&#8217;s Snowstorm. I think it had to do with the surprise of what looked to be a darker winter ale actually being a fruity Belgian. But then it&#8217;s unfair to compare these two completely different styles. So for the rye that it is, I enjoy it quite a bit. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll be honest, I preferred last year&#8217;s Snowstorm. I think it had to do with the surprise of what looked to be a darker winter ale actually being a fruity Belgian. But then it&#8217;s unfair to compare these two completely different styles. So for the rye that it is, I enjoy it quite a bit. Enough that I just picked up another 12 pack, and for me, the guy with a 9 months pregnant wife who&#8217;s cut way back on beer intake, that&#8217;s a big commitment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.brew52.com/2008/week52/a-big-commitment/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Full Circle</title>
		<link>http://www.brew52.com/2008/week52/full-circle/</link>
		<comments>http://www.brew52.com/2008/week52/full-circle/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2008 03:10:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Week 52]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Schell Snowstorm]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brew52.com/2008/week52/full-circle/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I can&#8217;t believe it&#8217;s already time for Schell Snowstorm again. I think Joe is right that this year&#8217;s version is better than last year. It&#8217;s maltier and while still sweet, it&#8217;s not as sickly sweet as last year&#8217;s version. It&#8217;s been a fun year of beer tasting and this has been a great forum for [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t believe it&#8217;s already time for Schell Snowstorm again. I think Joe is right that this year&#8217;s version is better than last year. It&#8217;s maltier and while still sweet, it&#8217;s not as sickly sweet as last year&#8217;s version.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s been a fun year of beer tasting and this has been a great forum for sharing opinions about different beers every week. Thank you to all the other reviewers who shared your views on various beers, I learned a lot about beer this year thanks to you. Thanks also to Rett for putting up and maintaining the brew52 site, I know it&#8217;s been a burden at times but it&#8217;s been fun for me and I know others have enjoyed it as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.brew52.com/2008/week52/full-circle/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Flurries</title>
		<link>http://www.brew52.com/2008/week52/flurries/</link>
		<comments>http://www.brew52.com/2008/week52/flurries/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2008 00:19:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joe Lunchpail</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Week 52]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[schell]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brew52.com/2008/week52/flurries/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While much better than the 2007 Snowstorm, I&#8217;m not really that impressed with the 2008 version.  Definitely malty, with the rye coming through as well.  They say hints of chocolate, but I&#8217;m not catching it.  Good head and carbonation.  Not bad, not great.  Pretty much par for Schell.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While much better than the 2007 Snowstorm, I&#8217;m not really that impressed with the 2008 version.  Definitely malty, with the rye coming through as well.  They say hints of chocolate, but I&#8217;m not catching it.  Good head and carbonation.  Not bad, not great.  Pretty much par for Schell.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.brew52.com/2008/week52/flurries/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.227 seconds -->

