<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Brew52 &#187; Week 46</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.brew52.com/2008/category/week46/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.brew52.com/2008</link>
	<description>52 Minnesota beers reviewed for the 52 weeks of 2008.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2009 15:16:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Great. Northern. Porter.</title>
		<link>http://www.brew52.com/2008/week46/great-northern-porter/</link>
		<comments>http://www.brew52.com/2008/week46/great-northern-porter/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 20:25:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joe Lunchpail</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Week 46]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[porter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Summit]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brew52.com/2008/week46/great-northern-porter/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That about sums it up.  A solid porter that is a lot lighter in body than it looks. Good flavor and aroma.  I like it.  Re: Summit Winter samplers I, too, was a bit confused at the selections included in the sampler.  Lord knows I would&#8217;ve liked to see the Oatmeal Stout and/or the Porter in [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That about sums it up.  A solid porter that is a lot lighter in body than it looks. Good flavor and aroma.  I like it. </p>
<p>Re: Summit Winter samplers</p>
<p>I, too, was a bit confused at the selections included in the sampler.  Lord knows I would&#8217;ve liked to see the Oatmeal Stout and/or the Porter in the mix.  Something to think about, Summit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.brew52.com/2008/week46/great-northern-porter/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>get in my pie</title>
		<link>http://www.brew52.com/2008/week46/get-in-my-pie/</link>
		<comments>http://www.brew52.com/2008/week46/get-in-my-pie/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 18:12:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>flashmcduff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Week 46]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Great Northern Porter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Summit]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brew52.com/2008/week46/get-in-my-pie/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Very good porter and I&#8217;ll be making a Porter Pumpkin Pie with it for Thanksgiving . Thanks, indeed. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very good porter and I&#8217;ll be making a Porter Pumpkin Pie with it for Thanksgiving . Thanks, indeed. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.brew52.com/2008/week46/get-in-my-pie/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>the perfect porter?</title>
		<link>http://www.brew52.com/2008/week46/the-perfect-porter/</link>
		<comments>http://www.brew52.com/2008/week46/the-perfect-porter/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 04:19:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Week 46]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brew52.com/2008/week46/the-perfect-porter/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Man this is a solid solid beer. I know it&#8217;s good, but I&#8217;m always surprised as how good, and how consistently good.  And Rett, I couldnt agree more about the winter sampler: I skipped it because it didn&#8217;t have the porter.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Man this is a solid solid beer. I know it&#8217;s good, but I&#8217;m always surprised as how good, and how consistently good.</p>
<p> And Rett, I couldnt agree more about the winter sampler: I skipped it because it didn&#8217;t have the porter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.brew52.com/2008/week46/the-perfect-porter/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Smokey, light wintry goodness</title>
		<link>http://www.brew52.com/2008/week46/smokey-light-wintry-goodness/</link>
		<comments>http://www.brew52.com/2008/week46/smokey-light-wintry-goodness/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 03:01:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dave</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Week 46]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brew52.com/2008/week46/smokey-light-wintry-goodness/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Summit northern porter is filled with wonderful!  I grabbed one after work and couldn&#8217;t wait to pour a beer after getting home.  Maybe it is just getting extra props for being picked at the start of the cold season, but I am really enjoying this beer even while writing this post.  I think the beer [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Summit northern porter is filled with wonderful!  I grabbed one after work and couldn&#8217;t wait to pour a beer after getting home.  Maybe it is just getting extra props for being picked at the start of the cold season, but I am really enjoying this beer even while writing this post.  I think the beer could use a little more body, I&#8217;m a fan of how guinness tastes like a meal and feel like that is more how a winter beer should be which is why it lost half a star.  I dont even know if a porter is supposed to be a winter beer, it just tastes like one but light and smooth as well.  The smoky flavor it has is great as well, this is a perfect beer for just chillin and enjoying beer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.brew52.com/2008/week46/smokey-light-wintry-goodness/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mmmmm&#8230;winter beers are back&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.brew52.com/2008/week46/mmmmmwinter-beers-are-back/</link>
		<comments>http://www.brew52.com/2008/week46/mmmmmwinter-beers-are-back/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 12:36:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Week 46]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brew52.com/2008/week46/mmmmmwinter-beers-are-back/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This porter has a nice black color, excellent bitter coffee aroma however not much head (at least pouring it from a bottle to a glass).  The flavor mirrors the aroma and is very flavorful upfront, finishing clean.  Porters can be pretty hit or miss in my book ranging from a beer that is dark in [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This porter has a nice black color, excellent bitter coffee aroma however not much head (at least pouring it from a bottle to a glass).  The flavor mirrors the aroma and is very flavorful upfront, finishing clean.  Porters can be pretty hit or miss in my book ranging from a beer that is dark in color but weak in flavor to ones you&#8217;d almost mistake for a stout.  Summit&#8217;s version is a nice, solid porter that I think I&#8217;m enjoying more this year than in the past. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.brew52.com/2008/week46/mmmmmwinter-beers-are-back/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>how is this not in the Winter sampler?</title>
		<link>http://www.brew52.com/2008/week46/how-is-this-not-in-the-winter-sampler/</link>
		<comments>http://www.brew52.com/2008/week46/how-is-this-not-in-the-winter-sampler/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 03:03:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rett</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Week 46]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[big top]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[midway]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[porter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Summit Brewing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[summit porter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[winter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brew52.com/2008/week46/how-is-this-not-in-the-winter-sampler/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was over in the Midway yesterday, my old stomping grounds, so I went to Big Top to pick up the Summit Porter. I ended up getting a 12 pack only because it was a better value than the 6 pack ($10.99/12 vs. $7.99/6) and the Winter sampler pack only had Winter Ale, Extra Pale [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was over in the Midway yesterday, my old stomping grounds, so I went to Big Top to pick up the Summit Porter. I ended up getting a 12 pack only because it was a better value than the 6 pack ($10.99/12 vs. $7.99/6) and the Winter sampler pack only had Winter Ale, Extra Pale Ale, Extra Special Bitter, and India Pale Ale. Maybe it&#8217;s just me but I totally think the Porter should be in there instead of the EPA. <span id="more-654"></span></p>
<p>Well, not a big deal that I got a 12-pack since the Porter kicks ass. I&#8217;m on number 2 right now, and I&#8217;m really enjoying the chocolatey coffee flavors and the sweet finish. Seems like the perfect way to start off what&#8217;s gonna be a long winter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.brew52.com/2008/week46/how-is-this-not-in-the-winter-sampler/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.261 seconds -->

