<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Brew52 &#187; elvisneedsboats</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.brew52.com/2008/author/elvisneedsboats/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.brew52.com/2008</link>
	<description>52 Minnesota beers reviewed for the 52 weeks of 2008.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2009 15:16:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Falt</title>
		<link>http://www.brew52.com/2008/week6/falt/</link>
		<comments>http://www.brew52.com/2008/week6/falt/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 01:33:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>elvisneedsboats</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Week 6]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brew52.com/2008/week6/falt/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Now, I have a bias against the Herkimer. I just don&#8217;t have a high opinion of the joint. Don&#8217;t care for the food and don&#8217;t like that the only beer I can drink when I&#8217;m there is theirs. So that said, I thought this beer tasted like the rice vinegar that was sitting on the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now, I have a bias against the Herkimer. I just don&#8217;t have a high opinion of the joint. Don&#8217;t care for the food and don&#8217;t like that the only beer I can drink when I&#8217;m there is theirs. So that said, I thought this beer tasted like the rice vinegar that was sitting on the table next to me. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.brew52.com/2008/week6/falt/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>There are times when I don&#8217;t like to think and drink</title>
		<link>http://www.brew52.com/2008/week5/there-are-times-when-i-dont-like-to-think-and-drink/</link>
		<comments>http://www.brew52.com/2008/week5/there-are-times-when-i-dont-like-to-think-and-drink/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2008 21:12:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>elvisneedsboats</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Week 5]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brew52.com/2008/week5/there-are-times-when-i-dont-like-to-think-and-drink/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks to Summit Winter, I don&#8217;t have to. It&#8217;s perfect for the season. I would give it 5 stars, but I need to reserve a .5 in case we get to the Oatmeal Stout. On a side note, (which should probably be my main note since it&#8217;s longer than my review) I went to Memory [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks to Summit Winter, I don&#8217;t have to. It&#8217;s perfect for the season.  I would give it 5 stars, but I need to reserve a .5 in case we get to the Oatmeal Stout. </p>
<p> On a side note, (which should probably be my main note since it&#8217;s longer than my review) I went to Memory Lanes last week and asked for one on tap. To my shock, they had already changed out their seasonal to Maibock. Beer isn&#8217;t fashion &#8211; I don&#8217;t need the spring styles in winter. As much as I hate it, winter lasts through March 21. I want my Summit Winter on tap through then and don&#8217;t want to see Maibock until Mai.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.brew52.com/2008/week5/there-are-times-when-i-dont-like-to-think-and-drink/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>I gotta stop reading the label first</title>
		<link>http://www.brew52.com/2008/week4/i-gotta-stop-reading-the-label-first/</link>
		<comments>http://www.brew52.com/2008/week4/i-gotta-stop-reading-the-label-first/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 15:37:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>elvisneedsboats</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Week 4]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brew52.com/2008/week4/i-gotta-stop-reading-the-label-first/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The problem is this&#8230;I poured my Surly in a glass (like is says on the can), took a sip and thought &#8220;mmm, Summit Extra Pale Ale-y&#8221;, which was confirmed by the hoppy goodness I read about on the side of the can. Then I got to the part about citrus and pine. And I thought, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem is this&#8230;I poured my Surly in a glass (like is says on the can), took a sip and thought &#8220;mmm, Summit Extra Pale Ale-y&#8221;, which was confirmed by the hoppy goodness I read about on the side of the can. Then I got to the part about citrus and pine. And I thought, &#8220;I don&#8217;t want pine in my beer! What retard would infuse beer with pine?!&#8221; and started sniffing the glass and combing my palate for some sort of piney aftertaste. I just want to drink and enjoy the beer on its own merits without outside influence. So from now on, no more reading about the beer until review time.</p>
<p> Considering that the Furious didn&#8217;t go down in one sitting (it probably took an hour from start to finish during various chores), I wasn&#8217;t excited about it as I thought. However, I would like to try another out at a bar in a social setting to see how I feel about it. I like Surly for their design, the brand they&#8217;ve built so far and general chutzpah for starting a brewery and for me that goes a long way. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.brew52.com/2008/week4/i-gotta-stop-reading-the-label-first/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Delicious.</title>
		<link>http://www.brew52.com/2008/week3/delicious/</link>
		<comments>http://www.brew52.com/2008/week3/delicious/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 05:35:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>elvisneedsboats</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Week 3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Delicious]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Happiness in a Bottle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Manna]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brew52.com/2008/week4/delicious/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[No snarky comments. No hate. I didn&#8217;t even read the label except for 1 small thing: St. Paul water. And here I thought Richfield water was good. Who knew?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No snarky comments. No hate. I didn&#8217;t even read the label except for 1 small thing: St. Paul water. And here I thought Richfield water was good. Who knew?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.brew52.com/2008/week3/delicious/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Looking for a great bock beer? Keep looking.</title>
		<link>http://www.brew52.com/2008/week2/looking-for-a-great-bock-beer-keep-looking/</link>
		<comments>http://www.brew52.com/2008/week2/looking-for-a-great-bock-beer-keep-looking/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 02:29:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>elvisneedsboats</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Week 2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[baseball]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[glueks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[honey bock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twins]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brew52.com/2008/week2/looking-for-a-great-bock-beer-keep-looking/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you listen to the Twins on the radio, the only way to enjoy a ball game outside of actually going in person, you&#8217;ve heard the relentless ads for Gluek&#8217;s Honey Bock &#8211; several times a night. And yet, I managed to go all of last season without having one (ah, the power of advertising). [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you listen to the Twins on the radio, the only way to enjoy a ball game outside of actually going in person, you&#8217;ve heard the relentless ads for Gluek&#8217;s Honey Bock &#8211; several times a night. And yet, I managed to go all of last season without having one (ah, the power of advertising). So I was kinda excited to see this on the list so I could see if it&#8217;s worth sitting on the porch this summer with a few in the cooler while the game&#8217;s on (pitchers and catchers report Feb 14!) The answer&#8230;not really. </p>
<p>While I will say this beer isn&#8217;t terrible, once you get past the first swig (bleh), it&#8217;s not one I want to have over and over for 9 innings. I don&#8217;t know how many Bock beers Dan Gladden&#8217;s had, but somehow I don&#8217;t think he cares (think quantity, not quality). Too much honey, not enough Bock if you ask me. Had this been a Shiner Honey Bock, I might have been more forgiving, but Gluek&#8217;s doesn&#8217;t carry a lot of weight with me as a brewery (or an establishment).  Still, better than the Snow Storm from last week.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.brew52.com/2008/week2/looking-for-a-great-bock-beer-keep-looking/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>My two word review: Shit Storm</title>
		<link>http://www.brew52.com/2008/week1/my-two-word-review-shit-storm/</link>
		<comments>http://www.brew52.com/2008/week1/my-two-word-review-shit-storm/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jan 2008 19:28:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>elvisneedsboats</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Week 1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[malty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nasty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[schells]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unpleasant]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brew52.com/2008/week1/my-two-word-review-shit-storm/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My longer review: I always lean toward the underdog (Kucinich &#8217;08!) and want to see them come out on top, so it&#8217;s with much disappointment that I come down against Schell&#8217;s Snow Storm. I couldn&#8217;t wait to finish this and I nearly didn&#8217;t, but I always finish my beer (with the exception of that craptacular Fat Tire [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My longer review: I always lean toward the underdog (Kucinich &#8217;08!) and want to see them come out on top, so it&#8217;s with much disappointment that I come down against Schell&#8217;s Snow Storm. I couldn&#8217;t wait to finish this and I nearly didn&#8217;t, but I always finish my beer (with the exception of that craptacular Fat Tire pint I tried because everyone raves about it for some reason).
<p>A few things just from the back of the label: &#8220;inspired by the Monastic beers of Belgium&#8221; &#8211; This is like saying Lichtenstein was inspired by the Old Masters because the results are pretty far off. Have we been to the same Belgium? Second, what&#8217;s a &#8220;subtle overtone&#8221;? Can an overtone really be subtle? Maybe like a hushed crescendo. 
<p>I will say this &#8211; the 6 malts did stand out, unpleasantly so as did the spice factor. If I had to compare the taste to something I&#8217;d say it&#8217;s like a Blue Moon with a rancid orange squeezed in. Very nasty. This is one case where my taste buds trump my indy spirit because if this were offered to me for free next to a Budweiser I had to pay for, I&#8217;d take the Bud and, dammit, I hate Bud. And paying.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.brew52.com/2008/week1/my-two-word-review-shit-storm/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.524 seconds -->

