<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Brew52 &#187; briz</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.brew52.com/2008/author/briz/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.brew52.com/2008</link>
	<description>52 Minnesota beers reviewed for the 52 weeks of 2008.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2009 15:16:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Surly Furious &#8211; In your face.</title>
		<link>http://www.brew52.com/2008/week4/surly-furious-in-your-face/</link>
		<comments>http://www.brew52.com/2008/week4/surly-furious-in-your-face/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jan 2008 17:31:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>briz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Week 4]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brew52.com/2008/week4/surly-furious-in-your-face/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I recall when first I tried Furious, being a hop-enthusiast, I enjoyed the first 1/4 of the beer, but then it became unpleasantly excessive for 1/2 the beer, and then good again.  Now it has grown on me, and I love it on almost any occasion.  Interestingly a friend of mine who hates alcohol and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I recall when first I tried Furious, being a hop-enthusiast, I enjoyed the first 1/4 of the beer, but then it became unpleasantly excessive for 1/2 the beer, and then good again.  Now it has grown on me, and I love it on almost any occasion.  Interestingly a friend of mine who hates alcohol and bitter beers sampled mine and compared it to the pint of amber he had bought, and found it &#8220;fruitier&#8221; and more drinkable.   If you find a tap that&#8217;s not so fresh, it does have a tendency however to have a gritty dry stale bread flavor.  Furthermore, despite Surly&#8217;s assertions to the quality of canned beer, i find it to taste different (even when poured in a glass) out of cans.  I admit there are a lot of variables at play like temperature, freshness, pour, carbonation level, atmosphere, and expectation to name a few, but generally the hops are more subdued and the beer has less body.  Nonetheless I am glad to have another tasty option in a narrow field of canned beers for outdoor activities in safe packaging.  In other news, I hate the name for reasons I won&#8217;t expound upon at this time, especially considering it&#8217;s pointlessness.  <img src='http://www.brew52.com/2008/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />   Despite all my criticism, the beer&#8217;s merits overshadow all else.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.brew52.com/2008/week4/surly-furious-in-your-face/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>a mixed bag.</title>
		<link>http://www.brew52.com/2008/week3/a-mixed-bag/</link>
		<comments>http://www.brew52.com/2008/week3/a-mixed-bag/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 01:37:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>briz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Week 3]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brew52.com/2008/week3/a-mixed-bag/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Poured great; I like a lot of head out of my belgian&#8217;s without blowing out of the glass.  This one did not disappoint, however it receded fast.  I suspect it was too cold at first.  My first impressions commiserate with Aaron&#8217;s &#8220;homebrew&#8221; comment.  However the flavors opened up some as it warmed up.  The hops [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Poured great; I like a lot of head out of my belgian&#8217;s without blowing out of the glass.  This one did not disappoint, however it receded fast.  I suspect it was too cold at first.  My first impressions commiserate with Aaron&#8217;s &#8220;homebrew&#8221; comment.  However the flavors opened up some as it warmed up.  The hops became a nice green herbal sensation.  Citrus flavors mucked about.   Soon however, it was drowned by dinner: pizza.  Overal, very drinkable but a near miss.  The nose remained a little pungent and the body lost most of its carbonation.</p>
<p>Cheers,</p>
<p>-b</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.brew52.com/2008/week3/a-mixed-bag/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>April Showers.</title>
		<link>http://www.brew52.com/2008/week1/april-showers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.brew52.com/2008/week1/april-showers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 04:10:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>briz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Week 1]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brew52.com/2008/week1/april-showers/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Honestly I don&#8217;t remember a great deal about this beer, having started long before, except that it had a nice lemony zest and some belgian tasting yeast.  All-together better than I anticipated but felt out of season.  However beware; gravity kills those who don&#8217;t pay it mind, and it&#8217;s lurking in there.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Honestly I don&#8217;t remember a great deal about this beer, having started long before, except that it had a nice lemony zest and some belgian tasting yeast.  All-together better than I anticipated but felt out of season.  However beware; gravity kills those who don&#8217;t pay it mind, and it&#8217;s lurking in there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.brew52.com/2008/week1/april-showers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8216;Gluek&#8217;s de beer in de silver can, it taste de best?&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://www.brew52.com/2008/week2/glueks-de-beer-in-de-silver-can-it-taste-de-best/</link>
		<comments>http://www.brew52.com/2008/week2/glueks-de-beer-in-de-silver-can-it-taste-de-best/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 03:51:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>briz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Week 2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[-b]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brew52.com/2008/week2/glueks-de-beer-in-de-silver-can-it-taste-de-best/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The first words out of my mouth were. &#8220;mm, tastes like aluminum.&#8221; (We got the canned version, but despite pouring in glasses, still tasted metallic. Perhaps our local establishment does not move a great deal of this product either.) That aside, it was disappointingly much like a Milwaukie&#8217;s best ice with a smattering of caramel [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The first words out of my mouth were.  &#8220;mm, tastes like aluminum.&#8221;  (We got the canned version, but despite pouring in glasses, still tasted metallic.  Perhaps our local establishment does not move a great deal of this product either.)   That aside, it was disappointingly much like a Milwaukie&#8217;s best ice with a smattering of caramel malt to disguise the fact.  :-/ It is what it is.  One could do worse, and it may prove an effective gateway beer, but not likely for those who would be inclined to engage in the reviewing of beers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.brew52.com/2008/week2/glueks-de-beer-in-de-silver-can-it-taste-de-best/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.238 seconds -->

